← Back to Home

Cancer: One Label, Two Perspectives

From Understanding to Engineering Practice (For Those Who Truly Want to Improve Their State)

We often refer to “cancer” as if it were a single fact. In reality, it is a broad label that summarizes a complex biological reality. The same reality can be expressed through two different cognitive systems. Understanding this distinction is the starting point for moving beyond confusion toward a rational, actionable approach.

1. Medical Diagnosis Perspective: Your Safety Traffic Light

Medicine uses clinical evidence — imaging, pathology, staging, biomarkers, and longitudinal follow-up — to establish diagnosis and guide treatment decisions.

This diagnosis functions like a clear traffic light system:

🔴 / 🟡 — Current health risk is meaningfully elevated
📏 — Strict safety rules must be followed: professional care, monitoring, and evidence-based treatment plans

Core value: Medicine’s role is not to fully explain every upstream trajectory in one sentence, but to clearly state “what must be done now to remain safe.” It is the essential tool for risk control and clinical decision-making.

2. Body State Perspective: Your Physiological Roadmap

The body does not move from “healthy” to “cancer” overnight. Tissue microenvironments, inflammation, repair capacity, metabolic load, and nutrient ratios can drift over long periods — like an evolving curve.

In this view, “cancer” is:

The body’s state curve entering a segment that medicine has labeled “high-risk.”

Key insight:
“Cancer” is ultimately a road-segment label. It tells you where you are and what rules must be followed on this stretch — but it cannot tell you the full upstream path, whether your broader system state is stabilizing or destabilizing, or how your long-horizon steady-state background may be shifting.

3. Engineering Description of Body State: Five-Dimensional Steady-State Space

In the life steady-state engineering framework, body state is represented as a five-dimensional coordinate:

(Na/K, Cu/Se, Cu/Zn, Fe/Mn, Ca/Mg)

This is a continuous, measurable, direction-trackable steady-state space.

A medical diagnosis (e.g., cancer) is not a fixed point in this space, but the projection of prolonged deviation in certain regions onto clinical outcomes such as uncontrolled growth and tissue-level failure.

4. Reference Steady-State Ranges (Green Zone)

Ratio AxisReference Steady-State Range
Na/K2.0 – 3.4
Cu/Se7 – 30
Cu/Zn0.083 – 0.25
Fe/Mn7.5 – 15
Ca/Mg4.0 – 11.0

Note: These ranges are for engineering trend analysis and modeling only. They do not constitute medical diagnostic criteria.

5. Empirical Observation: Cu/Zn as a “Growth–Suppression Balance” Axis

In long-horizon steady-state observation, Cu/Zn can be treated as a practical axis describing the balance between:

In this engineering view:

(Engineering correlation demonstration only. No causal claims. Not for diagnosis or treatment.)

6. Supporting Scientific References: Serum Cu/Zn Ratio and Cancer Risk / Prognosis

The following are selected observational studies and meta-analyses showing an association (not causation) between higher serum/plasma Cu/Zn ratio and increased cancer risk or poorer prognosis across multiple cancer types. These are for reference only and do not constitute diagnostic or treatment recommendations.

  1. Czarnocki et al. (2024)
    Serum Levels of Copper and Zinc and Survival in Breast Cancer Patients.
    Nutrients, 16(7):1000.
    DOI: 10.3390/nu16071000
    Key finding: Highest quartile serum Cu/Zn ratio associated with poorer 10-year overall survival (HR 2.26) and breast cancer-specific survival (HR 2.07).
  2. Zhang et al. (2022)
    Association between serum copper/zinc ratio and lung cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 74:127067.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2022.127067
    Key finding: Lung cancer patients had significantly higher serum Cu/Zn ratio than controls (SMD 1.62); higher in advanced vs. early stage.
  3. Stepien et al. (2022)
    Prediagnostic Levels of Copper and Zinc and Breast Cancer Risk in the ORDET Cohort.
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 31(6):1209-1219.
    DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1256
    Key finding: Highest tertile prediagnostic plasma Cu/Zn ratio associated with higher breast cancer risk (OR 1.75).
  4. Stepien et al. (2017)
    Pre-diagnostic copper and zinc biomarkers and colorectal cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort.
    Carcinogenesis, 38(7):699-707.
    DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgx051
    Key finding: Higher Cu/Zn ratio associated with increased colorectal cancer risk (OR 1.75).

Important Note: All listed studies are observational. They demonstrate association, not causation. Direct evidence for HTMA-derived Cu/Zn ratios in cancer risk assessment is limited, and mainstream medicine does not recommend HTMA for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment guidance.

7. Engineering Practice: Four-Step Method

Goal: Gradually shift deviated ratios (e.g., elevated Cu/Zn) back toward reference ranges.

  1. Measure — Use HTMA (Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis); focus on ratio trends, not single absolute values
  2. Assess — Is Cu/Zn chronically above the reference range? Is the trend worsening or stabilizing?
  3. Act (example directions only):
    • Avoid unnecessary copper load (especially high-dose supplements) unless clinically indicated
    • Support zinc-containing whole foods and balanced dietary context (example categories: seafood, legumes, seeds, certain meats)
    • Maintain an overall anti-excess strategy (avoid extreme single-nutrient interventions without professional guidance)
    All changes must not replace medical care or contradict professional advice.
  4. Repeat — Re-test every 90 days; monitor directional movement toward reference ranges

8. Critical Boundaries (Must Read)

Final Summary

Medicine marks the current high-risk segment with the label “cancer.”
Your body state describes the long-horizon background that can influence how resilient (or fragile) the system is over time.

Wise health management is never either/or. It is:

Hold the roadmap (understand your body state), obey the traffic lights (follow medical advice), and steer safely toward a better destination.

The most important sentence:
Diagnosis is a signpost that must be taken seriously — but it is never the destination.
Read the signpost to avoid wrong turns; read the road to go farther.