We often refer to “cancer” as if it were a single fact. In reality, it is a broad label that summarizes a complex biological reality. The same reality can be expressed through two different cognitive systems. Understanding this distinction is the starting point for moving beyond confusion toward a rational, actionable approach.
1. Medical Diagnosis Perspective: Your Safety Traffic Light
Medicine uses clinical evidence — imaging, pathology, staging, biomarkers, and longitudinal follow-up — to establish diagnosis and guide treatment decisions.
This diagnosis functions like a clear traffic light system:
🔴 / 🟡 — Current health risk is meaningfully elevated
📏 — Strict safety rules must be followed: professional care, monitoring, and evidence-based treatment plans
Core value: Medicine’s role is not to fully explain every upstream trajectory in one sentence, but to clearly state “what must be done now to remain safe.” It is the essential tool for risk control and clinical decision-making.
2. Body State Perspective: Your Physiological Roadmap
The body does not move from “healthy” to “cancer” overnight. Tissue microenvironments, inflammation, repair capacity, metabolic load, and nutrient ratios can drift over long periods — like an evolving curve.
In this view, “cancer” is:
The body’s state curve entering a segment that medicine has labeled “high-risk.”
Key insight:
“Cancer” is ultimately a road-segment label. It tells you where you are and what rules must be followed on this stretch —
but it cannot tell you the full upstream path, whether your broader system state is stabilizing or destabilizing,
or how your long-horizon steady-state background may be shifting.
3. Engineering Description of Body State: Five-Dimensional Steady-State Space
In the life steady-state engineering framework, body state is represented as a five-dimensional coordinate:
(Na/K, Cu/Se, Cu/Zn, Fe/Mn, Ca/Mg)
This is a continuous, measurable, direction-trackable steady-state space.
A medical diagnosis (e.g., cancer) is not a fixed point in this space, but the projection of prolonged deviation in certain regions onto clinical outcomes such as uncontrolled growth and tissue-level failure.
4. Reference Steady-State Ranges (Green Zone)
| Ratio Axis | Reference Steady-State Range |
|---|---|
| Na/K | 2.0 – 3.4 |
| Cu/Se | 7 – 30 |
| Cu/Zn | 0.083 – 0.25 |
| Fe/Mn | 7.5 – 15 |
| Ca/Mg | 4.0 – 11.0 |
Note: These ranges are for engineering trend analysis and modeling only. They do not constitute medical diagnostic criteria.
5. Empirical Observation: Cu/Zn as a “Growth–Suppression Balance” Axis
In long-horizon steady-state observation, Cu/Zn can be treated as a practical axis describing the balance between:
- Growth support capacity (e.g., pro-growth and pro-remodeling background conditions)
- Growth suppression and repair reserve (e.g., stabilization, repair, and control capacity)
In this engineering view:
- Higher Cu/Zn often aligns with a system background that is less resistant to “error amplification” over time
- The relationship is typically continuous and cumulative, not sudden
(Engineering correlation demonstration only. No causal claims. Not for diagnosis or treatment.)
6. Supporting Scientific References: Serum Cu/Zn Ratio and Cancer Risk / Prognosis
The following are selected observational studies and meta-analyses showing an association (not causation) between higher serum/plasma Cu/Zn ratio and increased cancer risk or poorer prognosis across multiple cancer types. These are for reference only and do not constitute diagnostic or treatment recommendations.
-
Czarnocki et al. (2024)
Serum Levels of Copper and Zinc and Survival in Breast Cancer Patients.
Nutrients, 16(7):1000.
DOI: 10.3390/nu16071000
Key finding: Highest quartile serum Cu/Zn ratio associated with poorer 10-year overall survival (HR 2.26) and breast cancer-specific survival (HR 2.07). -
Zhang et al. (2022)
Association between serum copper/zinc ratio and lung cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 74:127067.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2022.127067
Key finding: Lung cancer patients had significantly higher serum Cu/Zn ratio than controls (SMD 1.62); higher in advanced vs. early stage. -
Stepien et al. (2022)
Prediagnostic Levels of Copper and Zinc and Breast Cancer Risk in the ORDET Cohort.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 31(6):1209-1219.
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1256
Key finding: Highest tertile prediagnostic plasma Cu/Zn ratio associated with higher breast cancer risk (OR 1.75). -
Stepien et al. (2017)
Pre-diagnostic copper and zinc biomarkers and colorectal cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort.
Carcinogenesis, 38(7):699-707.
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgx051
Key finding: Higher Cu/Zn ratio associated with increased colorectal cancer risk (OR 1.75).
Important Note: All listed studies are observational. They demonstrate association, not causation. Direct evidence for HTMA-derived Cu/Zn ratios in cancer risk assessment is limited, and mainstream medicine does not recommend HTMA for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment guidance.
7. Engineering Practice: Four-Step Method
Goal: Gradually shift deviated ratios (e.g., elevated Cu/Zn) back toward reference ranges.
- Measure — Use HTMA (Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis); focus on ratio trends, not single absolute values
- Assess — Is Cu/Zn chronically above the reference range? Is the trend worsening or stabilizing?
- Act (example directions only):
- Avoid unnecessary copper load (especially high-dose supplements) unless clinically indicated
- Support zinc-containing whole foods and balanced dietary context (example categories: seafood, legumes, seeds, certain meats)
- Maintain an overall anti-excess strategy (avoid extreme single-nutrient interventions without professional guidance)
- Repeat — Re-test every 90 days; monitor directional movement toward reference ranges
8. Critical Boundaries (Must Read)
- This content does not alter the medical definition of cancer
- It does not replace diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment
- It does not promise cure
- HTMA is used solely as an auxiliary tool for long-term steady-state trend observation
- If you suspect cancer or have cancer, seek professional care immediately and follow evidence-based treatment
Final Summary
Medicine marks the current high-risk segment with the label “cancer.”
Your body state describes the long-horizon background that can influence how resilient (or fragile) the system is over time.
Wise health management is never either/or. It is:
Hold the roadmap (understand your body state), obey the traffic lights (follow medical advice), and steer safely toward a better destination.
The most important sentence:
Diagnosis is a signpost that must be taken seriously — but it is never the destination.
Read the signpost to avoid wrong turns; read the road to go farther.