← Back to Home

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD): One Label, Two Perspectives

CVD as a “Five-High Syndrome” in the Five-Ratio Model (Engineering View)

We often talk about “cardiovascular disease (CVD)” as if it were one single fact. In reality, CVD is a large family of outcomes (heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and related vascular conditions) that can be described through two different cognitive systems. Understanding this distinction is the starting point for moving beyond confusion toward a rational, actionable approach.

1. Medical Diagnosis Perspective: Your Cardiovascular Traffic Light

Medicine uses objective criteria — blood pressure readings, lipid panels, imaging, cardiac tests, symptoms, clinical history, and event-based diagnosis (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke) — to determine risk level and decide what must be done now to remain safe.

This diagnosis functions like a clear traffic light system:

🔴 / 🟡 — Current cardiovascular risk is meaningfully elevated
📏 — Strict safety rules must be followed: professional care, monitoring, medication when indicated, and evidence-based lifestyle management

Core value: Medicine’s role is not to compress all upstream causes into one sentence, but to clearly state “what must be done now to remain safe.” It is an essential tool for risk control and clinical decision-making.

2. Body State Perspective: Your Physiological Roadmap

The body does not suddenly “become cardiovascular disease” on a single day. Vascular tone, endothelial function, inflammation background, metabolic load, and nutrient ratios drift continuously over long periods — like an evolving curve.

In this view, “CVD” is:

The body’s state curve entering a segment that medicine has labeled “high-risk.”

Key insight:
“CVD” is ultimately a road-segment label. It tells you where you are and what rules to follow on this stretch — but it cannot tell you how you arrived here, whether your trajectory is worsening or stabilizing, or whether improvement is possible ahead.

3. Engineering Description of Body State: Five-Dimensional Steady-State Space

In the life steady-state engineering framework, body state is represented as a five-dimensional coordinate:

(Na/K, Cu/Se, Cu/Zn, Fe/Mn, Ca/Mg)

This is a continuous, measurable, direction-trackable steady-state space.

A medical label (e.g., CVD) is not a fixed point in this space, but the projection of prolonged deviation in multiple regions onto vascular outcomes such as elevated blood pressure, loss of vascular elasticity, plaque progression, and event risk.

4. Reference Steady-State Ranges (Green Zone)

Ratio AxisReference Steady-State Range
Na/K2.0 – 3.4
Cu/Se7 – 30
Cu/Zn0.083 – 0.25
Fe/Mn7.5 – 15
Ca/Mg4.0 – 11.0

Note: These ranges are for engineering trend analysis and modeling only. They do not constitute medical diagnostic criteria.

5. Engineering Definition: CVD as a “Five-High Syndrome”

In this engineering model, CVD commonly appears when the system spends long periods in a five-axis high-load state. We call this a “Five-High Syndrome” (engineering term, not a medical diagnosis).

Five-High Syndrome (engineering meaning):

Interpretation: the system is running “high tension + high noise + low recovery” for too long, and the vascular system becomes the most visible failure surface.

Key insight:
CVD is rarely a single-axis problem. It is more often a multi-axis accumulation where Ca/Mg provides the physical vascular constraint, Na/K drives sustained stress input, and Cu/Se amplifies long-horizon aging and inflammation background.

6. Supporting Scientific References: Mineral Ratios and Cardiovascular Disease Risk

The following are selected observational studies and meta-analyses showing associations (not causation) between elevated ratios in the five-axis model and increased CVD risk, hypertension, or related outcomes. These are for reference only and do not constitute diagnostic or treatment recommendations.

  1. Mirmiran et al. / related longitudinal study (2023)
    Dietary sodium to potassium ratio is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events.
    PubMed Central (PMC10111692).
    DOI: PMC10111692
    Key finding: Higher Na/K ratio associated with increased CVD events (HR 1.99 in high vs. low Na intake context; independent predictor).
  2. Wabo et al. (2022)
    Association of dietary calcium, magnesium, sodium, and potassium intake and hypertension (NHANES 8-year data).
    Nutrition Research and Practice, 16(1):74-93.
    DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2022.16.1.74
    Key finding: Higher Ca/Mg ratio patterns linked to elevated hypertension risk; joint high Ca + high Mg intake protective (OR 0.81 overall).
  3. Meta-analysis on Cu/Zn (2024)
    Association between biomarkers of zinc and copper status and heart failure.
    ESC Heart Failure (PMC11424300).
    Key finding: Heart failure patients show higher serum Cu and lower Zn (elevated Cu/Zn ratio) vs. controls.
  4. Jiang et al. (2024) / related
    Serum calcium-magnesium ratio predicts adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndrome.
    PLOS One.
    Key finding: Elevated serum Ca/Mg ratio associated with worse outcomes in ACS patients (hypertension common comorbidity).

Important Note: All listed studies are observational (cohort, cross-sectional, or meta-analyses). They demonstrate association, not causation. Evidence for HTMA-derived ratios in CVD risk is limited; mainstream medicine does not recommend HTMA for CVD diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment guidance.

7. Engineering Practice: Four-Step Method

Goal: Reduce time spent in the “five-high” zone and shift ratios back toward reference ranges, without replacing medical care.

  1. Measure — Use HTMA; focus on ratio trends, not single absolute values
  2. Assess — Are multiple axes chronically above range? Which axis is most dominant (often Ca/Mg and Na/K)?
  3. Act (example directions only):
    • Reduce chronic stress input (sleep regularity, recovery scheduling, lifestyle rhythm) to lower Na/K drive
    • Avoid extreme single-nutrient interventions; aim for balanced whole-food structure that supports relaxation reserve (Ca/Mg direction)
    • Reduce long-term oxidative/metabolic burden (Fe/Mn direction) and support cleanup capacity (Cu/Se direction) through balanced diet context
    All changes must not replace medication or contradict medical advice.
  4. Repeat — Re-test every 90 days; monitor directional movement toward reference ranges

8. Critical Boundaries (Must Read)

Final Summary

Medicine marks the high-risk segment with the label “CVD.”
The engineering model describes a common background: prolonged time in a multi-axis high-load state (“Five-High Syndrome”).

Wise health management is never either/or. It is:

Hold the roadmap (understand your body state), obey the traffic lights (follow medical advice), and steer safely toward a better destination.

The most important sentence:
Diagnosis is a signpost that must be taken seriously — but it is never the destination.
Read the signpost to avoid wrong turns; read the road to go farther.